|
|
|---|
|
PhotoRESEARCHER |
PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter for February Week Three # 449C |
KEY WORDS: |
Stealing Photos
|
Documentation
|
Unauthorized Photo Use
|
National Magazine
|
Copyright Law
|
Re-Use
|
Central Art Library
|
Image Snatching
|
Stock Photographers
|
Photo Researchers
|
Manipulation
|
Enhancement
|
Abraham Lincoln
|
Mathew Brady
|
Kent State
|
Brad Pitt
|
Reagan Photo
| Welcome to PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter, a weekly newsletter from
PhotoDaily, PhotoSource International. Want to read back issues of PhotoResearcher Newsletter? http://www.photoresearchn To sign up for our photoRESEARCHER Newsletter, visit us online at: (If you do not wish to receive the PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter, please
see the instructions at the end of this newsletter.)
|
Pulp Stock Fiction
ADVANCE NOTES: "To be seen (get exposure), or to protect (prohibit access to images)" -- that is the choice facing stock photographers who are examining whether to use the Web as an avenue to showcase their photographs and make more contacts with photobuyers.
Here’s what a photographer wrote to me (he was new to the industry): "I know the stock photo industry is based mainly on trust, and I just hope this will continue. But more and more I am hearing of cases where magazines and book publishers are stealing photos and using them for their own purposes."
Will the book publisher or magazine editor who has pilfered a photographer’s photo please step forward?
I've heard this accusation many times, and when a reader sends me such a message, I quickly request, "Please give me documentation on when and where this has happened."
Rarely does the person who sent me the message have documentation that the rumored incident really happened. Those few that even respond, tell of a foreign newspaper that ‘stole’ a photo, or a book publisher who it turns out honestly believed that the photo belonged to their art department. The most common examples of unauthorized photo use are the cases of "innocent infringement" by a Boy Scout group, a hospital, a church bulletin, a student organization, who has "borrowed" a photo from the Net.
#######################################
"...risking their good reputation? I don't think so."
######################################
But a national magazine or book publisher risking their good reputation for the price of a photo? I don’t think so.
The stories you hear that are supposedly real theft cases, in reality are fiction.
Some common misunderstandings:
Some publishers read the Copyright Law (mistakenly, in my view) as giving them authority to re-use a photo they previously published. They maintain they own electronic second rights for photos they have previously leased, in order to maintain control of the images in their central art library .
The book publishers, magazines, and newspapers that have been found to knowingly use a photo they have in their files for second usage, are not attempting to clandestinely steal the photo. (It wouldn't be worth the risk of loss of good will in the creative community, and the blot on their integrity.) Their intent is often to test interpretation of the Copyright Law.
You can understand their point of view. Their database of previously published photos is an excellent source of visuals. The task to track down the copyright holder of a photo for permission for re-use can be prohibitive in labor and cost.
Want to read more of this article? Go To http://www.photosource.com/researcher/may001a
|
Bill Morgenstern |
Seeing Is…. Unbelieving
Source: http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering Manipulation of photos (or “ enhancement ,” as it’s sometimes called) has been going on a long time. Here are excerpts from a web page that has tracked down famous examples of alterations or trick photography, down through history.
Want to read more of this article? Go To http://www.photosource.com/
Robert Sena
Watch
for developments in the field of stock photography in
PhotoResearcher's Newsletter Note: If the URL is long, it may extend to two lines. In that case - clicking on it won't work. Instead, "copy and paste" the URL. GOING, GOING, STILL GOING. Getty Images which recently put itself up for sale, has received no bids above its current $1.6 billion market cap, according to the New York Times. http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/02/11/getty-images-rpt-auction-finds-no-premium-bids/ SLOWING DOWN. Jupiters Images shows weak first quarter. http://www.abouttheimage.com/jupiter_posts_weak_1q07_stock_price_sags/ WHO’s LOOKING? Clarity Sought on Electronics Searches - The Electronic Frontier Foundationand Asian Law Caucus, two civil liberties groups in San Francisco, plan tofile a lawsuit to force the government to disclose its policies on border searches, including which rules govern the seizing and copying of the contents of electronic devices. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020604763_pf.html NOW THEY TELL US . Grand Theft Photo - Think embedding a watermark or circle-C into your pictures will prevent them from being stolen? Burch stopped doing that because it wasn't even a speed bump to the thieves. All they do is convert the JPEG to TIFF, then back to JPEG -- it removes the encrypted digitial watermark! http://www.popphoto.com/popularphotographyfeatures/5001/grand-theft-photo.html MODEL RELEASE NOT NECESSARY. Dreamstime Launches Editorial License - Dreamstime has expanded its editorial license policy to accept non-model released and non-property released images that are directly pertinent to current events, news and political stories, and social and cultural scenes. http://www.stockphotographer.info/content/view/651/92/ FAREWELL . Three years ago, Adobe built a stock photo service into Creative Suite 2. No More Adobe Stock Photo Service - March 3, 2008, is the last day you can use the service to search for an image and download comps. March 31, 2008, is the last day to purchase images. http://www.creativepro.com/story/news/26369.html CLONES? NO WAY! Photographer finds Flickr pics sold on iStockphoto - An Icelandic photographer has for a second time encountered the ugly side of Internet photo sharing, finding photos she published at Yahoo's Flickr site being sold by somebody else through Getty’s iStockphoto Web site. http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9867114-39.html?tag=bl NO CLONES HERE, EITHER . No Two Alike? - Having made more than 7,000 pictures of snowflakes, Dr. Kenneth Libbrecht is in a pretty good position to say each one is unique. http://www.popphoto.com/photographynewswire/5099/no-two-alike.html COLLECTOR’S ITEM . Like Polaroid film? Better start hoarding - Polaroid is getting out of the film business. http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9867913-39.html?tag=bl GETTY WATCH . Getty bid deadline passes, at least one offer - It was unclear how firm any offers were or whether they were for the whole or parts of Getty. http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSN0742341620080208 AHEAD OF THE BELL . Getty Images Shares Drop in Premarket Trading After News reports say that sale may not happen. Mastin upgraded shares to "Outperform" from "Market Perform," saying the Seattle-based company has a strong cash flow and increasing diversity. http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080211/getty_images_ahead_of_the_bell.html?.v=1
Now
you can search back issues of PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter.
On your Web browser go to: http://www.photosource.com/researcher/list.html
then type in your keyword. Reproducing
or copying photoRESEARCHER Newsletter for non-private purposes
is not permitted without written consent of the publisher,
except for review purposes where source credit is given. ##
PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter monthly newsletter is produced
by PhotoDaily, PhotoSource International, Rohn Engh, Director,
who is solely responsible for its contents. To
make a photo listing: ##
PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter monthly newsletter is produced
by PhotoDaily, PhotoSource International, Rohn Engh, Director,
who is solely responsible for its contents. PhotoSource International |
Want to Invite Google to Index your Web Page?
The search engine, Google, adds and updates new sites to its index each time it “crawls” the Web. Google invites you to submit your Web page’s URL. They don’t add all submitted URLs to their index, and they cannot make any predictions or guarantees about when your website will be indexed. But it’s worth giving it a try. To add your website: http://www.google.com/addurl/ TIP: Set up a blog on www.blog ger.com and post to it regularly. Mention various pages on your site from time to time. Create links to them too. Blogger is owned by Google and the links in your blog will get indexed quickly.
####################
|