|
|
|---|
|
PhotoRESEARCHER |
PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter for July Week Three## 442C |
KEY WORDS: | DarkNet | Hollywood | Stolen Photos | First Amendment | Copyright | Innocent Infringers | Internet Thievery | John Wayne | “The Blair Witch Project” | Computer Visuals | Stephen King | Editorial Photography |
Welcome to PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter, a monthly newsletter from PhotoDaily, PhotoSource International. <http://www.photoresearchnews.com/> To sign up for our photoRESEARCHER Newsletter, visit us online at: (If you do not wish to receive the PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter, please
see the instructions at the end of this newsletter.)
|
ImageSnatchers.Com
Internet Thievery
Will It Extend To Stock Photos?
Advance Notes: The big debate of the hour is about "image snatching" on the Internet. Is it real? Or just an unfounded fear that isn’t worth the worry? This article opens up the debate, examines the threat and invites your comments.
The Year is 2011. A photographer is jolted by a devastating report. Three dozen of her images have been snatched by an infamous cyber-outlaw who penetrates firewalls, de-codes passwords and hurdles even the toughest of encryption. The report says that the photos were stolen at midnight and sold before dawn through the DarkNet at Shanghai.com, which has distributed them to discount buyers worldwide. The photographer can do nothing about it. The increasing incidence of such cases is dramatically affecting the willingness of photographers to make their photos available on-line, and this convenient and efficient channel for images is drying up.
As a photo researcher, you might wonder who really owns copyright on the images you just licensed.
Well, this makes for a good Hollywood scenario, but don’t waste energy worrying that it might happen.
Sure, some places, some times, "someones" will steal a photo. But the rare times this occurs won't warrant photographers giving up this lucrative avenue of marketing their work, nor making negative and inconvenient barriers to potential buyers by installing complex protection techniques.
"STOLEN PHOTOS..." That expression conjures up copyright infringement and neglect of a photographer’s rights, and curtailment of photobuyers' image sources.
Periodically, I get phone calls and letters from photographers who are dismayed that I suggest that Web sites such as Google, Yahoo! and others, should be allowed to display-for-view images that they find on the World Wide Web.
A PROMOTIONAL ADVANTAGE
On first examination, this thought seems almost sacrilegious to some stock photographers. When I point out there is a promotional advantage to having their photos displayed (with their credit line) to Internet viewers (e.g. the public-- e.g. photo researchers and potential photobuyers), some photographers are still not convinced.
From my minority position, which is squarely between photo researchers who are looking for photos, and photographers who are looking to sell their photos, I don't see this situation as a disadvantage for either party.
In fact, if the practice of displaying photos in this manner were stopped, I would view it as an affront to both the photographer's pocketbook and the First Amendment rights of photo buyers and suppliers. Without the free flow of information, we all lose. (Photos are information.)
Here’s an example: in our email newsletter, PhotoStockNOTES, and on our Web site, we include a very popular section called, "Photography In The News." Often we show pictures taken by top photojournalists from Time, Newsweek, and other major and minor news organizations, magazines and newspapers, under titles such as "How The Pros Photograph An Iowa Caucus," – or "How to Photograph a Seattle Demonstration," or, "Views of the Lunar Eclipse –In Case You Missed It."
If I were to carry this "image thievery" theme to its ultimate conclusion, you would not be allowed to view those photos.
Even though I am not selling these images, just pointing to where they can be viewed, the infringement police might take me to task. So I'd stop linking to this kind of photo display. I would not want to risk displaying a photo for you that was breaking a proposed new Copyright\Internet "forbidden to show" law. Besides, it would not be worth it to find the author and seek permission to display it.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"Worry is as useless as a handle on a snowball..."
--Mitzi Chandler
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
We have all heard of cases of "innocent infringers," from church or community groups to local clubs, who have become "image snatchers" and lifted photos to use for their Web sites. More serious cases have now and then come up-- usually in the adult sites area, Playboy magazine, etc. No doubt the publicity these cases receive will serve to accelerate the education about copyright requirements that we need to get to the public.
Some photographers still hesitate to display their photos on the Web for fear of thievery, and therein lies the dilemma. In the age of the Internet, photographers need to assess whether it is smart business to hold back their photos (and credit line) from the viewing public.
It really is an "either/or" situation.
Want to read more of this article? Go to http://www.photosource.com/researcher/apr001.html
Helen Schwartz
| Real Pictures Sell
Centuries ago, storytellers would regale villagers with tales of adventure, the glories of victory, and the horrors of defeat. The imagination of the listener was a partner in creating the depth of the emotional impact of the stories. When motion pictures came along, the depiction of adventure, strife, and war was laid out in visual detail with the magic of cinema. Imagination no longer figured in. Hollywood directed whether we shivered with delight or closed our eyes in fright. But motion pictures focussed on fantasy, not delivering human
reality to the masses. This kind of John Wayne-make-believe
in tinsel-town lasted until the Vietnam War, when we were
introduced to real-time TV coverage, albeit censored by the
networks. To expect to -- or try to -- depict real emotions on film in the past was the job of artful movie directors and career actors. But now comes along a new medium of motion pictures, the video format. The producers of the box-office hit, "The Blair Witch Project," asked, "What if we allowed real people to video tape themselves during their own experience in a potentially near-hysteria situation?" The producers gave three pick-up actors (I’ll call them participants) a high-end video camera and ample tape. They pointed the participants, a female and two males in their 20’s, into the woods and gave them an assignment to look into a folktale about a witch that legend says once frequented the distant hills. The box office proved (as you know, the movie has made millions) that viewers were ready to pay for a motion picture that was void of professional actors, computer visuals, and million-dollar backdrops. Yes, Internet hype drove many to the film out of curiosity. But word-of-mouth drove the box office receipts off the charts. Viewers were given a peeping-tom license into a story line that strung together raw footage that laid out the three participants’ internal selves as if their emotions were beef cattle parts being prepared for supermarket meat counter packaging. (Sorry, I didn’t know any other way to say it.) Did the film propose some message? Since the outcome of the film wasn’t predetermined, the traumatized actors were at the mercy of each sequential 3x5-file card with instructions that the producers had given them on the first day of their four-day trek. The message of the film became as cryptic and as intriguing as a rumor -- real, yet maybe unreal. Whatever. Did this experience engender a new genre of film? Was it some
kind of faux snuff experience in disguise? Will we see new
stalls at the video stores: "B-W-P-Type Films"?
Probably not, because everything that follows The Blair Witch
Project will be tinted with the temptation to do it one better.
When you pull a mask from a face at the Halloween Ball, the
black cat is out of the bag. Therein lies the unique voyeurism
of this film. Like the wonder of having your first child,
it’s impossible to repeat the primordial experience. Want to read more of this article? Go to: http://www.photosource.com/researcher/dec994.html
######################
Sanjay Marathe
Watch
for developments in the field of stock photography in
PhotoResearcher's Newsletter Note: If the URL is long, it may extend to two lines. In that case - clicking on it won't work. Instead, "copy and paste" the URL.
TRAVEL Best airfares to places that are a photographer's dream http://travel.latimes.com/articles/la-trw-airfares8jul08
WAR PHOTOS Iwo Jima was the site of some of
the fiercest fighting of World War II, and the photograph
taken by AP photographer Joe Rosenthal of the flag-raising
atop Iwo Jima's Mount Suribachi on Feb. 23, 1945, came to
symbolize the Pacific War and the valor of the Marines.
TRAVELERS
ABROAD
Shawn McGrath Robert Maust Jason Lauré
Lois Olson ######################################### Now
you can search back issues of PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter.
On your Web browser go to: http://www.photosource.com/researcher/list.html
then type in your keyword. Reproducing
or copying photoRESEARCHER Newsletter for non-private purposes
is not permitted without written consent of the publisher,
except for review purposes where source credit is given. ##
PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter monthly newsletter is produced
by PhotoDaily, PhotoSource International, Rohn Engh, Director,
who is solely responsible for its contents. To
make a photo listing: Next Week: Easy Photo Research
If you’d rather not receive this kind of e-mail, reply with a <no thanks> and provide us with the original address at which you received the e-mail, so we can ensure your request is handled correctly. Thank you!
********** ##
PhotoRESEARCHER Newsletter monthly newsletter is produced
by PhotoDaily, PhotoSource International, Rohn Engh, Director,
who is solely responsible for its contents. PhotoSource International
########################### To
cancel your subscription, send email to: |
That “c” with a circle around it, ©, is the familiar copyright notice. On a photo, it alerts readers, and would-be infringers, that the photo is under U.S. Copyright Law protection. Does this symbol need to be displayed on all your photos for you to be protected? In other words, if someone uses a photo without the permission of the photographer, but the photo does not contain a copyright notice, is that person still guilty of infringing? The answer is yes. Someone who uses a photo they see in a publication, without getting the photographer’s permission (let alone paying him or her), is violating copyright, whether or not there’s a copyright notice on the photo. Under current law, photos are protected by copyright whether or not the photographer puts a copyright notice on them. However, the fact that a photo does not have a copyright notice on it may result in a lower damages award, under copyright law’s "innocent infringer" defense.
Better Information
##################### Looking for “Non-Generic” photos for your next project?
#######################
For photo researchers, the
Internet has finally matured... Say good bye to long, harrowing, frustrating searches when you need an EXOTIC, UNIQUE, HISTORICAL, CELEBRITY, SCIENTIFIC, HARD-TO-FIND photo. Now you can use the Internet to quickly locate the source of a hard-to-find image, and save yourself tons of labor and time. And it's FREE. Here's how: Step 1: Using the popular search engine, Google, type in the words or phrase that describes the picture you need.
For a fast check on how this works, go to Google and type one of the following phrases into the search bar: To locate a particular town or village: To find an exotic weed, or flower: An historical event: To find a geographical location: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dennis Frates
GOT A PHOTO NEED? Send
it to eds@photosource.com (Just write up your photo listing
in any way you feel clearly gets across what you need) or
use our standard form at < http://www.photosource.com/
####################
Mel Glynn
##################### White Mailers ######################
Travelwriter Marketletter is a monthly publication available
online
###################### Why tire your eyes reading hundreds of Photo Stock Lists when
you can let a search engine on the Web do the searching for
you? With the PhotoSourceBANK we can help you save time and
your eyesight. |
|