Keywords;copyright infringement, lawsuit, filed, photographer, cover photo, statue,infringed, copyright, district court, summary judgment,judgment without trial.
Copyright Answers
January 2001

J. Dianne Brinson is a copyright attorney specializing in intellectual property. She is co-author of The Multimedia Law and Business Handbook ($44.95 plus $7 p&h), and author of INTERNET LEGAL FORMS FOR BUSINESS ($24.95 plus $5 p&h). LADERA PRESS, 3130 Alpine Rd., Suite 200-9002, Menlo Park CA 94025. On-line she may be reached at LaderaPres@aol.com; Web: www.laderapress.com. Her Web site includes a free primer on intellectual property law.


Are The Aesthetic Elements Of Your Photo Protected By Copyrights?

Several months ago, I wrote about the case Leigh v. Warner Brothers, a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by photographer Jack Leigh against Warner Brothers. Leigh took the cover photo of the "Bird Girl" statue for the book Midnight in the Garden
of Good and Evil.
" Leigh claimed that Warner Brother’s depiction of the statue in the movie and in publicity stills infringed his copyright in his photograph.

            As I reported in the earlier column, the district court granted summary judgment (judgment without trial) to Warner Brothers, holding that none of the depictions of the statue by Warner Brothers was substantially similar to Leigh’s photograph. The Court of Appeals recently reversed part of that decision.

            The Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court that the depiction of the "Bird Girl" in the movie was not substantially similar to Leigh’s photograph. However, the court held that Leigh was entitled to have a jury determine whether the Warner Brothers stills were substantially similar to Leigh’s photograph. The Court noted that while Leigh’s copyright does not cover the appearance of the statue or the association of the statue with the Midnight story, his copyright does protect elements of artistic craft such as "the selection of lighting, shading, timing, angle, and film." If the jury concludes that the photographer who took the Warner Brothers stills copied these protected elements from Leigh’s work, Leigh will win this aspect of his lawsuit.

  • - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -
  • Leigh v Warner Bros. 10 F.Supp 2d 1371, 1998
  • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

For More Copyright Answers


Back to PhotoSource
International Home Page
Who are we? Help
Contact Us Q&A